News & Analysis as of

TX Supreme Court Expert Testimony Expert Witness

IMS Legal Strategies

Effective Strategies for Daubert and Robinson Challenges

IMS Legal Strategies on

In high-stakes litigation, expert testimony that cannot withstand a Daubert or Robinson challenge can derail even the most well-prepared case. A failed Daubert or Robinson challenge can leave attorneys without their key...more

Butler Snow LLP

The Texas Multiple Personality Privilege: Privileged Communications with an Expert Witness Who is Also Your Client

Butler Snow LLP on

Over a decade ago, the Texas Supreme Court held that any document provided to a testifying expert in anticipation of her testimony must be disclosed to the other side, regardless of whether the expert relied on the document....more

White and Williams LLP

Privileged Communications With a Testifying Client/Expert

In In re City of Dickinson, 568 S.W.3d 642 (Tex. 2019), the Supreme Court of Texas recently assessed whether a client’s emails with its counsel were subject to disclosure after the client was designated as a testifying expert...more

Clark Hill PLC

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies When an Expert Opinion is Conclusory

Clark Hill PLC on

Conclusory opinions, especially by experts, constitute no evidence. Two recent opinions from the Texas Supreme Court explain when an expert opinion is conclusory....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide