News & Analysis as of

U.S. Treasury Texas

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

FinCEN Southwest border GTO challenged by Texas trade group

On April 1, 2025, the Texas Association for Money Service Businesses filed a lawsuit in San Antonio federal court challenging the recent Geographic Targeting Order (GTO) applicable to money services businesses (MSBs) located...more

Clark Hill PLC

CTA Litigation Update: Reporting Remains Voluntary

Clark Hill PLC on

On Jan. 23, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the Dec. 5 nationwide injunction in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland (E.D. Tex.) that had halted Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) enforcement nationwide. The stay of this...more

Kerr Russell

CTA Enforcement Remains Suspended Amid Ongoing Litigation

Kerr Russell on

On January 23, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the U.S. Department of Justice’s request to stay the nationwide injunction that had previously banned enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its key...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Court Strikes Down Federal Surprise Billing QPA Calculation Rules, Continuing Pause on Arbitrations

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On August 24, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas once again struck down parts of the regulations governing the arbitration process created by the No Surprises Act (NSA) to settle payment disputes...more

McDermott+

Implementation of the No Surprises Act Is Full of Surprises: What We Do and Don’t Know

McDermott+ on

It’s likely no surprise to anyone who has been following the implementation of the No Surprises Act over the last couple of years that we again find ourselves on an uncertain path. While Regs & Eggs has focused on some of the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

District Court Vacates Provisions of No Surprises Act Final Rule

McDermott Will & Emery on

On February 6, a US district court in Texas vacated provisions of the No Surprises Act final rule related to the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process for determining payment for out-of-network services....more

ArentFox Schiff

No More Surprise Medical Bills: Providers Continue to Pursue Additional Challenges to Government Rulemaking Under No Surprises Act

ArentFox Schiff on

In parallel cases, health care providers are continuing to challenge rulemaking by the US Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) under the No Surprises Act (the Act). Having already...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

Texas Medical Association Again Challenges Federal Rules Under No Surprises Act

The Texas Medical Association is yet again challenging the federal government’s implementation of the independent dispute resolution process established by the No Surprises Act, this time arguing the $350 fee to initiate the...more

King & Spalding

Texas Medical Association Files Third Challenge to No Surprises Act

King & Spalding on

On November 30, 2022, the Texas Medical Association (TMA) filed a third lawsuit challenging the regulations implementing the No Surprises Act (NSA). TMA’s latest suit before the United States District Court for the Eastern...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Eastern District of Texas Invalidates Parts of Implementing the No Surprises Act

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On July 26, 2022, Judge Jeremy Kernodle of the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that certain parts of the Interim Final Rule Part II implementing the No Surprises Act (the Act) were invalid. This ruling is nearly identical...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

No Surprises Act Challenges, Win for Providers

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On Wednesday, February 23, 2022, U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Kernodle of the Eastern District of Texas granted the Texas Medical Association’s and Adam Corley’s (the Plaintiffs) motion for summary judgment on their...more

Verrill

Surprise Medical Bills: Texas District Court Vacates Portion of Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process in Agency Rule

Verrill on

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas recently vacated a portion of the Requirements Related to Surprise Billing, Part II, Interim Final Rule (the “Rule”) regarding the independent dispute resolution (IDR)...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Texas District Court Vacates Portions of No Surprises Act Rule Related to Arbitration

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On February 23, 2022, Judge Jeremy Kernodle of the Eastern District of Texas ruled that certain parts of the Interim Final Rule Part II (the Rule) implementing the No Surprises Act (the Act) are invalid. Specifically, the...more

King & Spalding

152 Members of Congress Submit Letter Urging Revisions to No Surprises Act Independent Dispute Resolution Process

King & Spalding on

On November 5, 2021, 152 members of the U.S. House of Representatives submitted a letter to the Secretaries of the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury (the Departments) urging the Departments to...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide