News & Analysis as of

Urban Planning & Development › Appeals › Eminent Domain

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Court Affirms Eminent Domain Taking for Downtown Zanesville Redevelopment Project

Roetzel & Andress on

The Ohio and U.S. Constitutions require that the power of eminent domain can only be exercised when necessary for a public use. In the 2005 case of Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court took an expansive view...more

Nossaman LLP

Government’s Enforcement of Development Plan Conditions is Not a Taking

Nossaman LLP on

When a property owner commits to developing property in a certain manner, including providing a certain number of parking spaces, and the local government agency enforces the owner’s failure to comply, does the enforcement...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Mass. Appeals Court Upholds Somerville’s Union Square Revitalization Plan

Pierce Atwood LLP on

In 2012, the City of Somerville, the Somerville Redevelopment Authority (SRA), and the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development approved the Union Square Revitalization Plan (the Plan), an urban renewal...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

10th Circuit Holds Colorado’s Urban Renewal Statute Violates Due Process in M.A.K. Investment Group v. City of Glendale

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on

On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit issued a surprising ruling establishing that a municipality must provide individual notice to property owners whose property is located within an area determined...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide