News & Analysis as of

US Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) Department of the Interior

K&L Gates LLP

Department of the Interior Issues Flurry of Actions Targeting Wind and Solar Energy Projects

K&L Gates LLP on

Under Secretary Doug Burgum, the Department of the Interior (DOI) has quickly moved to implement Sections 4 and 5 of President Trump’s 7 July Executive Order 14315 titled “Ending Market Distorting Subsidies for Unreliable,...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

Incidental Take of Migratory Birds Once Again a Federal Crime; FWS Considering New Permitting Program

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

After a brief hiatus, incidental take of migratory birds will again be a federal crime beginning December 3, 2021. Less than 10 months after instituting a final rule declaring that incidental take of birds is not subject to...more

Stoel Rives - Renewable + Law

Biden Administration Proposes Rollback of Trump Administration Migratory Bird Rule

In May, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) announced a proposed rule revoking the Trump administration’s final rule on incidental take under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”). In the January 7, 2021 final...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Fish and Wildlife Service Proposes to Restore Incidental Take Prohibition Under Migratory Bird ‎Treaty Act – What You Need to Know

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On May 7, 2021, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS” or “Service”) published a proposed rule that would restore the traditional interpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) as prohibiting incidental take...more

Holland & Hart LLP

Wildlife Roundup

Holland & Hart LLP on

The regulation of protected wildlife is likely to undergo a seismic shift as a result of the change in administrations. Whereas the Trump Administration took several actions to narrow the reach of wildlife protection...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

Federal Court Rejects Interior Department Interpretation Limiting Migratory Bird Treaty Act Liability For Intentional Acts

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

The Trump Administration’s efforts to clarify the scope of liability under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) suffered a setback when the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York concluded that the statute...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Court Rejects Trump Administration’s Migratory Bird Treaty Act Interpretation

On Aug. 11, 2020, a federal district court overturned the Trump administration’s 2017 interpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”). The MBTA implements four international conservation treaties and is intended to...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Trump Administration’s MBTA M-Opinion Vacated: What You Need to Know

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) was first adopted in 1918, and for most of its existence the Department of the Interior (“DOI”) interpreted it to prohibit any taking or killing of migratory birds, intentional or not. ...more

(ACOEL) | American College of Environmental...

Migratory Bird Treaty Act -- Scope of Act Rule

On February 3rd, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would completely eliminate criminal penalties for “incidental” migratory bird deaths under the Migratory Bird Treaty...more

Perkins Coie

Bird Is the Word: US Fish & Wildlife Service Proposes Narrow Interpretation of Migratory Bird Treaty Act

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a proposed rule on January 30, 2020, that narrowly interprets the protections afforded by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The new rule would provide that the MBTA prohibits only the...more

Nossaman LLP

USFWS proposes to codify Trump Administration position on MBTA

Nossaman LLP on

Yesterday, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) released a pre-publication version of its long-awaited update to regulations governing Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) implementation (Proposed Regulations)....more

Perkins Coie

California Affirms State Law Prohibition of Incidental Take of Migratory Birds Despite Contrary Federal Stance

Perkins Coie on

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California attorney general have jointly issued an advisory regarding California’s state law protections for migratory birds. The three-page advisory affirms that...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Migratory Bird Treaty Act: Environmental Organizations File Lawsuit Challenging Department of Interior Solicitor's Interpretive...

A number of environmental organizations filed a May 24th Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (“Complaint”) challenging as unlawful and arbitrary and capricious the: . . . December 22, 2017 Solicitor’s...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Fish and Wildlife Service Doubles Down on Department of Interior Opinion on Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)

On April 11, 2018, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issued a Memorandum titled “Guidance on the recent M-Opinion affecting the Migratory Bird Treaty Act” (the “Memorandum”), giving field advice to its enforcement...more

Perkins Coie

Department Of Interior Declares That Only Deliberate Acts Constitute Take Of Migratory Birds

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Office of the Solicitor issued Memorandum M-37050, on December 22, 2017, which adopts the position that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibition on the “taking” or “killing” of...more

Perkins Coie

Department of Interior Reverses MBTA’s Take Definition in a New Solicitor’s Opinion

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Office of the Solicitor issued Memorandum M-37050, on December 22, 2017, which adopts the position that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibition on the “taking” or “killing” of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

New Department of Interior Solicitor’s Opinion Provides Relief on Incidental Take of Migratory Birds

• The Opinion finds that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits only affirmative and purposeful actions to take migratory birds. Incidental takes that are not the purpose of an action, even if they are direct and...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Interior Department and Forest Service Identify Burdens on Domestic Energy Development

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Report on the agencies’ review of programs provides a roadmap to understanding which energy policies the Trump administration will revise. Several federal agencies have now issued reports responding to Executive Order (EO)...more

Nossaman LLP

Department of the Interior Announces Actions to Expedite Energy Development with Potential Consequences for Listed Species

Nossaman LLP on

On October 25, 2017, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) released a report entitled “Review of the Department of the Interior Actions that Potentially Burden Domestic Energy” identifying agency actions that potentially...more

Perkins Coie

DOI Issues Solicitor’s Opinion That MBTA Prohibits Incidental Take

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Office of the Solicitor issued Memorandum M-37041 on January 10, 2017, arguing that incidental take is prohibited under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The solicitor’s opinion was...more

20 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide