News & Analysis as of

United States Patent and Trademark Office › Rulemaking Process

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves a fundamental role in the U.S. intellectual property system by issuing patents and registering trademarks.... more +
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves a fundamental role in the U.S. intellectual property system by issuing patents and registering trademarks.    less -
ArentFox Schiff

USPTO Raises Annual Cap on Prioritized Patent Examination Requests

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has finalized a rule increasing the annual limit on accepted requests for prioritized patent examination from 15,000 to 20,000, effective with fiscal year 2025 (FY 2025). This...more

K&L Gates LLP

USPTO Discontinuing the Accelerated Examination Program for Utility Applications

K&L Gates LLP on

On 10 June 2025, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a Final Rule announcing the discontinuation of the Accelerated Examination program for utility applications beginning 10 July 2025. The change affects the...more

Haug Partners LLP

The PTAB’s Overhaul of Its Discretionary Denial Procedures Signals a Pro-Patent Pivot

Haug Partners LLP on

Since Acting USPTO Director Coke Morgan Stewart took office in 2025, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has overhauled its discretionary denial procedures for inter partes reviews (IPRs) and post-grant reviews (PGRs)....more

Fish & Richardson

2024 Post-Grant Annual Report

Fish & Richardson on

Fish & Richardson’s 2024 Post-Grant Report takes a deep dive into the cases, trends, and statistics that shaped Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice throughout the year and how they might affect practitioners going...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2024 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) continues to play a pivotal role in shaping the intellectual property landscape. In 2024, several developments affecting PTAB practice emerged, from new rulemaking at the USPTO to key...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Reviewing 2024's Crucial Patent Law Developments

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. on

As 2024 draws to a close, several crucial developments — some aimed at modernizing long-standing legal practices, others addressing emerging challenges — have reached patent law. Originally published in Law360 - December...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

USPTO Drops Proposed Rules on Terminal Disclaimers

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Earlier this year, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) proposed a sweeping set of rules imposing new requirements on terminal disclaimers filed to overcome obviousness-type double patenting (OTDP) rejections, and...more

Jones Day

USPTO Withdraws Proposal to Add New Terminal Disclaimer Requirements

Jones Day on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") has withdrawn its proposed rule regarding terminal disclaimer requirements....more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

The Beginning of the End for the USPTO’s After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The decision to end the program follows public resistance to a proposed fee structure aimed at offsetting its high administrative costs. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) extended the After Final Consideration...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Proposed Increases of United States Patent Fees

Ladas & Parry LLP on

On April 3, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a notice of rulemaking setting out the fees that it proposes for the fiscal year starting on September 29, 2024. Although the proposed fees are...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Reopens Comment Period for AI Inventorship Guidance

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) reopened and extended until June 20, 2024, the period for public comment on the guidance regarding inventorship in applications involving artificial intelligence (AI) assisted...more

Goodwin

USPTO Proposed Rulemaking Regarding Terminal Disclaimers

Goodwin on

The USPTO recently issued a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding terminal disclaimers. ...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

New IDS Requirement In USPTO Fee-Setting Proposal

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) proposed rulemaking that focuses on “fee adjustments” for 2025 includes a trap for the unwary related to Information Disclosure Statements (IDSs) that could complicate...more

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints

CFTC Report Calls on Agency to Engage in Rulemaking on AI — AI: The Washington Report

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints on

A working group within the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) released a report on May 2, 2024, concerning the risks posed by AI adoption in the derivatives market. The report warns that the adoption of AI tools...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

USPTO Aims to Mow Down Patent Thickets

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In a stunning Federal Register Notice published May 10, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) proposes to impose a new requirement on terminal disclaimers filed to overcome obviousness-type double patenting...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Issues Guidance, Request for Comment on AI Inventorship

McDermott Will & Emery on

On February 13, 2024, the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) issued a notice with examination guidance and request for comment regarding inventorship in applications involving artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted inventions....more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2023 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends: Federal Circuit Cases Exploring a Year of Rules, Rulemaking, and Rule Enforcement at...

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

A trio of cases this past year illustrate a trend of increasing importance in the power of Patent-Office rulemaking and enforcement, and the influence it has on patent owners and challengers alike....more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Proposes Rules Promoting Independence in Board Decision-Making

McDermott Will & Emery on

Seeking to bolster the independence of administrative patent judge (APJ) panels when issuing decisions and increase transparency regarding Patent Trial & Appeal Board processes, the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) issued a...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Akin Intelligence - September 2023

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Welcome to the September edition of Akin Intelligence. As the U.S. Congress reconvenes after the August recess, we continue to see bipartisan interest in artificial intelligence (AI) regulation. In the executive branch,...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - March 2023 #2

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

Apple Inc. v. Vidal, Appeal No. 2022-1249 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2023) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit allowed Apple’s challenge to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) Fintiv rules to proceed, at least...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Eliminates CLE Certification and Recognition for Patent Practitioners

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) announced a final rule amending 37 C.F.R. § 11.11(a)(1) and (a)(3) to eliminate provisions concerning voluntary continuing legal education (CLE) certification for registered patent...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Extends Public Comment Period on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) seeks public feedback on its existing patent subject matter eligibility (SME) guidance. The guidance was put in place in 2019. As noted in the PTO’s July 25, 2022, blog post, the 2019...more

White & Case LLP

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office seeks stakeholder input on Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision-making procedures

White & Case LLP on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's interim procedures for reviewing decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board are receiving increased scrutiny. On July 20, 2022, the PTO issued a notice announcing notice-and-comment...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

USPTO Proposes To Require Form For IDS PTA Safe Harbor

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The USPTO Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) rules include a “safe harbor” that avoids a PTA deduction for “Applicant delay” for Information Disclosure Statements that are accompanied by a certain statement averring that the items...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Supreme Court’s Denial of Apple and Mylan’s Petitions Leaves NHK/Fintiv Rule in Place

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. on

On January 18, the Supreme Court denied petitions for writs of certiorari from both Apple and Mylan Laboratories. Each company sought to challenge the NHK/Fintiv framework that was developed by the Patent Trial and Appeal...more

46 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide