News & Analysis as of

USTPO

McCarter & English, LLP

USPTO Increases Patent Fees Effective January 19, 2025

McCarter & English, LLP on

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently announced that it will increase patent fees effective January 19, 2025. The USPTO will raise almost all existing patent fees. Although the USPTO made a few exceptions for...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Optimizing Obviousness: Routine Optimization Can Fill in Prior Art Gaps

In an appeal from a Patent Trial & Appeal Board finding of invalidity, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the result-effective variable doctrine can apply even when there is no overlap between a claimed...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

PTAB Strategies and Insights Newsletter - December 2022

The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more

Lippes Mathias LLP

United States Patent and Trademark Office Reduces Trademark Office Action Response Deadline

Lippes Mathias LLP on

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) announced that beginning on December 3, 2022, trademark applicants will have three months to respond to office actions issued by the USPTO. The current deadline is six...more

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints

Uncertain Seas for SEP Sailing In the US – New Guidance May Cause Stormy SEP Future

The DOJ is requesting public comment on a new draft policy concerning licensing negotiations and remedies for standards-essential patents (SEPs) subject to voluntary F/RAND commitments recently jointly issued by the U.S....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

USPTO Works To Fight Fraud

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has seen a surge in trademark filings by 40%, which is the greatest number of new applications in trademark history. This rise in...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Proper Representation of Prophetic Examples

Earlier this month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a notice in the Federal Register providing guidance regarding the proper presentation of prophetic examples and working examples in a patent...more

Weintraub Tobin

The PTAB Requires Settlement And Collateral Agreements To Terminate IPRs

Weintraub Tobin on

Following the America Invents Act, a petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) has become a common method for challenging the validity of a patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) at the United States Patent...more

Mintz

TechConnect - Your Law Firm Link to Industry News - April 2018

Mintz on

Letter from the Editors - As Tolstoy once wrote, “Spring is the time of plans and projects.” Hopefully, the snows of winter are finally behind us, and it’s time to look forward, build, and create! We at Mintz Levin continue...more

Jones Day

ITC Flourishes in 2016 As District Courts and PTAB Wither

Jones Day on

As we have previously reported here, 2016 was a banner year for Section 337 proceedings at the ITC. Sixty new Section 337 related complaints were filed at the ITC—a 50% increase over the previous year. 2016’s tally exceeds...more

Knobbe Martens

The USPTO Amends AIA Trial Rules: 4 Changes That You Need To Know

Knobbe Martens on

On April 1, 2016, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued amended final rules that govern trials under the America Invents Act (AIA), including inter partes review, post-grant review, covered business method...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Quick Fixes and Proposed Rulemaking for PTAB Trial Rules Announced by Director Lee

Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and USPTO Director, Michelle Lee, announced on Friday that a series of actual and proposed rulemakings aimed at improving post-grant proceedings before the PTAB will be...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Invalidates Myriad Primer and Method Claims as Lacking Subject Matter Eligibility

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In a case styled as In re BRCA1- and BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer Test Patent Litigation (also known as Myriad v. Ambry), the Federal Circuit held four of Myriad’s “primer” claims and two of Myriad’s detection method claims...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

USPTO Extends Deadline to Comment on Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Yesterday at BIO’s session entitled “Patent-Eligibility from the Trenches: Practical Implications of the Supreme Court’s Prometheus (Mayo) and Myriad Decisions” a panel of experts and an engaged audience discussed the...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide