News & Analysis as of

Wage and Hour De Minimis Claims

Whiteford

Employment Law Update: Maryland Supreme Court Decides Not To Trifle With Wage And Hour Claims

Whiteford on

Ruling on a matter of first impression under Maryland law, the Maryland Supreme Court recently decided, in Martinez, et al. v. Amazon.com Services LLC, Misc. No. 17, Sept. Term 2024 (July 3, 2025), that the rule of “de...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The De Minimis Doctrine Lives to Fight Another Day

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: While reversing a grant of summary judgment in favor of an employer based on the de minimis doctrine, the Ninth Circuit held that the doctrine still can apply under the FLSA....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The De Minimis Doctrine Lives to Fight Another Day

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: While reversing a grant of summary judgment in favor of an employer based on the de minimis doctrine, the Ninth Circuit held that the doctrine still can apply under the FLSA....more

Cozen O'Connor

Third Circuit Court Opines on Donning and Doffing Under FLSA

Cozen O'Connor on

In Tyger v. Precision Drilling Corp., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the circumstances under which donning and doffing activities by employees may be compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). ...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Clocking In: What Employers Need to Watch for in Recent Court Decision on Unpaid Working Time

For decades, the Department of Labor (DOL) has recognized the impracticability of requiring Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) nonexempt employees to clock in exactly at the beginning of their scheduled shifts. In most...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

The De Minimis Doctrine May Not Be As Moribund As I Have Thought: Call Center Case Makes This (Important) Point

Fox Rothschild LLP on

I read an interesting blog post by Seyfarth Shaw on a working time case in a call center. I have often blogged about working time cases, preliminary/postliminary cases, and have lamented that the de minimis doctrine, often...more

Miller Nash LLP

As Time Goes by…Pay Practices Which May Be a Surprising Risk for Employers—Part 2

Miller Nash LLP on

In Part 2 of our blog series highlighting some of the risks for employers when pay and time practices don’t comport with wage and hour laws, the case details and key takeaways below should provide West Coast employers...more

Miller Nash LLP

As Time Goes by…Pay Practices Which May Be a Surprising Risk for Employers—Part 1

Miller Nash LLP on

As it turns out, yes, people do care about time. Two recent court cases highlight some of the risks for employers when pay and timekeeping practices don’t comport with wage and hour laws. We’ll provide overviews of each case...more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

Do We Have to Pay for That?  Part 1—COVID-19 Vaccination, Testing, and Screening Activities

In this blog series, we’ll look at a variety of activities and discuss whether an employer has to pay its non-exempt (i.e., overtime-eligible) employees for their time spent engaging in them.  We’ll focus on federal law, but...more

Littler

California Legislature Essentially Eliminates Public Works “De Minimus” Exception

Littler on

On September 30, 2020, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 2231, which limits the “de minimis” exception to California prevailing wage laws to all but the smallest projects.  Specifically, the new law limits the de minimis...more

Fisher Phillips

Employees Win Latest California Bag Check Case – But Court Leaves One Final Cliffhanger On The Compensability Of Closing Tasks

Fisher Phillips on

The long-fought bag-check battle against Apple is coming to an end, and the employee class just won a major victory in California when a federal court of appeals ruled that the company must pay its workers for the time spent...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Wave Of Wage-Hour Lawsuits Coming? Beware Of The Danger Zones

Fox Rothschild LLP on

I have been writing about wage hour issues that are implicated or raised by the continuing COVID-19 situation. Well, here’s another one. I warn that as businesses start to open up (or not), employees (and, more to the point,...more

Fisher Phillips

Now More Than Ever, California Employers Need To Stay Abreast Of Working Time and Control Issues

Fisher Phillips on

The California appellate courts, and the California Supreme Court, continue to weigh in on significant and compelling wage and hour issues that affect employers each day. “Hours Worked” Under The Control Test – Going Back...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

California Employers, Are You Ready To Be "Schooled"?

As Labor Day and "back to school" beckon, what new laws and trends are we seeing in California? Here are my picks: NATURAL HAIR MUST BE ALLOWED. A new California statute says natural hair styles must be allowed. So take a...more

Polsinelli

California says “Goodbye” to the De Minimis Doctrine

Polsinelli on

For years, courts applied the de minimis doctrine “to excuse the payment of wages for small amounts of otherwise compensable time upon a showing that the bits of time are administratively difficult to record.” Troester v....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Employment Flash - July 2019

This edition of Employment Flash looks at developments in labor and employment law, including a Supreme Court ruling that Title VII’s charge-filing requirement is nonjurisdictional and new state legislation in New York,...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Ninth Circuit Swiftly Rebuffs Attempted Expansion Of California De Minimis Doctrine

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On June 14, 2019, a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in consolidated appeals involving the compensability of pre-exit inspections of employee bags at two retail clothing store chains. While the...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

What’s Left of the De Minimis Doctrine in California? Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals May Soon Decide

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Last year, the California Supreme Court held the federal “de minimis” doctrine does not apply to California state law claims for unpaid wages for off-the-clock work allegedly performed on a regularly occurring basis in store...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: December 2018

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key employment law cases address meal periods and payment of wages....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Oh, The Places The California Supremes Will Go!

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: With apologies to Dr. Seuss, we’ve penned an ode to the judicial chaos of the year just past, highlighted by three California Supreme Court decisions—Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., Dynamex Operations v....more

Fisher Phillips

Top 50 Workplace Law Stories Of 2018

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with the news these days. It sometimes feels like you can’t step away from your phone, computer, or TV for more than an hour or so without a barrage of new information hitting the headlines—and you’re...more

McAfee & Taft

What exactly is “de minimis”? How to address off-the-clock work in light of modern technologies

McAfee & Taft on

Smartphones have changed the employment landscape. Non-exempt employees can communicate via text or email any time of day or night, and may be expected to. My habit in the evenings is to check my work email, even if only to...more

Payne & Fears

9 FAQs About De Minimis Doctrine After Troester v. Starbucks

Payne & Fears on

In Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, the California Supreme Court recently held that the federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to claims for unpaid wages under the California Labor Code. As a follow-up to our recent...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Best In Law: No Off-The-Clock Work - BB&K Partner Joseph Ortiz Writes About The Starbucks Wage-And-Hour Class Action Decision In...

California’s wage-and-hour laws are the most protective in the country. These protections, however, often lead to bankrupting, class-action lawsuits. Originally posted in The Press-Enterprise and other Southern California...more

Fisher Phillips

Of Trifles And Truffle Mochas: How A Recent Case Against Starbucks May Impact Retailers

Fisher Phillips on

This past summer, in a high-profile case brought against Starbucks, the California Supreme Court resolved an open question concerning compensable time. Or, at least it did to some extent. The court held that California...more

74 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide